I was lucky enough to read the original post. A worthy answer to the pile-on by the fan boys. Sorry you took it out but the pictures are wonderful on their own.
I know I'll regret this, but the files from my G3 seem to be on the same level of sharpness and color rendition as yours are. Maybe we got the only two good ones:-}
Excellent photos Kirk, no notes contrary in this posting so these *must* have been taken with the new all singing, all dancing OM-D yes??? :-)
{Whisper voice} DPR critics - Ssshhh, it's only an informed rumour but I hear the new OM-D shares exactly the same sensor that that piece of junk useless Panny G3. Oh dear!
5 comments:
Nooooo! I loved your earlier post! The sarcasm there was glorious. Its a shame that you had to take it down.
I was lucky enough to read the original post. A worthy answer to the pile-on by the fan boys. Sorry you took it out but the pictures are wonderful on their own.
I know I'll regret this, but the files from my G3 seem to be on the same level of sharpness and color rendition as yours are. Maybe we got the only two good ones:-}
Wow... again (or is it? Have I missed the original one? Hmmm.)
Gosh, stop making me want that Summilux 25mm, I need to keep my priorities straight!
repeat mantra: get a markins q10, i don't need more lenses. get a markins q10, i don't need more lenses...
Excellent photos Kirk, no notes contrary in this posting so these *must* have been taken with the new all singing, all dancing OM-D yes??? :-)
{Whisper voice} DPR critics - Ssshhh, it's only an informed rumour but I hear the new OM-D shares exactly the same sensor that that piece of junk useless Panny G3. Oh dear!
Post a Comment